Poor Jason Saddler - it's not easy being the victim of a growing wave of spleen towards bad development work.
For those of you not familiar with the story, Jason decided to collect a million shirts to send to Africa. As the Time article
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1987628,00.html#ixzz0nnqz07Hj) points out, it seemed pretty harmless and well-intentioned as an idea, but in reality these shirts will not only fail to address poverty: they will actually contribute to it by undermining the already struggling local textile market.
Not to mention, it is condescending to Africans to think that their problems can be solved with a t-shirt. Yes, clean, good quality clothes give people confidence and self-respect and often when I visit families in communities here, it is the first thing they wish for and spend money on when they have a little extra.
But it is a hundred-fold better to empower someone to earn their own living so that they can go out and buy a shirt themselves. A shirt that they like and are proud to wear, rather than one that bears a slogan like "sister for sale, will take any offer", "Proud Jewish Grandmother" or "I’m with stupid" (I’m not joking here, you want to believe the t-shirts that end up in refugee camps and remote villages in Africa).
Good Intentions are not enough
Back to Jason - I'm sure he's going through a rough time and feeling a bit disillusioned and hard-done by, however he has played an important role in raising public awareness of the need to be intentional and informed when doing development work. And even better, he has listened to his critics and decided to change his approach.
I’ve talked about the danger of naivety and good-intentions when trying to help before ((http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1987628,00.html#ixzz0nnqz07Hj)) and we all need to be aware that the reasons for poverty and injustice are deep, complex and – as they are often manmade - very unpleasant. As history has shown, we can’t just fix Africa’s problems by chucking money or hand-outs at them.
Say you spotted a naked 10 year old child on the street in January in Ireland. Would your first instinct be to give him some clothes and then send him on his way? What if you saw fifty naked children that day? You would probably be concerned and want to know what is going on. It’s unlikely you’d be able to clothe them all and you’d know there must be a bigger problem at stake.
In both cases, you would most likely stop and ask – why are you naked? Where are your parents? Should social services or the police be informed? If the worst thing you see when you look at these children is that they have no clothes then you’re not seeing the real problem.
This is a serious child protection issue that you are witnessing here and you need to address the cause of it, not just the symptoms.
Dumping handouts on developing countries
Jason’s critics, although harsh, make a valid case - hand-outs have been dumped on developing countries for decades but have made no inroads on stemming systematic poverty.
While gains have been made and aid does need to continue (I do not agree that community based aid should stop, although I do support many of the arguments made against direct budget support for governments), it also needs to be strategic and address the root causes of poverty.
Aid needs to empower people
Aid needs to empower people and treat them with respect. Before we start writing policies or projects that impact on African’s lives, we need to ask them what they want and we need to dig deep to understand the issues affecting their communities.
Maybe they do want the shirts, but if they were given a choice between shirts and livelihood opportunities that would allow them to buy their own clothes, as well as an end to the trade barriers, corruption and the decimation of local markets by careless aid, I’m pretty sure they would choose the latter.